Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Figure 4 | Molecular Pain

Figure 4

From: Differential lumbar spinal cord responses among wild type, CD4 knockout, and CD40 knockout mice in spinal nerve L5 transection-induced neuropathic pain

Figure 4

Numbers of infiltrating leukocytes (CD45hi ) in lumbar spinal cord following L5Tx in WT, CD4KO, and CD40KO mice. Total mononuclear cells collected as described in Figure 2 were analyzed for their content of infiltrating leukocytes. The temporal changes of the numbers of lumbar spinal cord infiltrating leukocytes in WT (A, n = 5–8), CD4 KO (B, n = 4) and CD40 KO (C, n = 4) mice are shown here (mean ± SEM). One-way ANOVA was performed to examine the basal level genotypic differences among naïve mice and no significant differences were found. Two-way ANOVA for data sets in each graph were performed. # indicates significant differences between the indicated group and all other groups within the same treatment group (including the corresponding Day 0 group). An additional significant result from statistical comparison is also shown within the graph. “Tx” = L5Tx, “Sh” = sham operation, “ipsi” = ipsilateral side, and “contra” = contralateral side. For naïve mice, “ipsi” = left and “contra” = right.

Back to article page

Molecular Pain

ISSN: 1744-8069

Contact us