Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Figure 1 | Molecular Pain

Figure 1

From: Intervention of electroacupuncture on spinal p38 MAPK/ATF-2/VR-1 pathway in treating inflammatory pain induced by CFA in rats

Figure 1

Behavioral test of rats in each group at different time-point. A. Ipsilateral percent swelling of the paw of rats in each group at different time-point. The percent swelling of the paw was assessed by using plethymometer and water displacement method. The percent swelling of the paw was measured pre-injection and on day 1, 3, 7, 14 and 21 after saline/CFA injection. All data are expressed as means±SEM, n=12. **P<0.01 vs. group Control. ▲ ▲ P<0.01 vs. group CFA. ● P<0.05, ● ● P<0.01 vs. group CFA+Sham EA. B. Ipsilateral paw withdrawal thresholds (PWTs) of rats in each group at different time-point. PWTs were assessed by using dynamic plantar aesthesiometer. PWTs were measured pre-injection and on day 1, 3, 7, 14 and 21 after saline/CFA injection. All data are expressed as means±SEM, n=12. **P<0.01 vs. group Control. ▲ ▲ P<0.01 vs. group CFA. ● ● P<0.01 vs. group CFA+Sham EA.

Back to article page

Molecular Pain

ISSN: 1744-8069

Contact us